Projects from ARC5935 - Seminar in situ: Miami Beach, a course offered by Florida International University's
School of Architecture and taught by David Rifkind at the College of Architecture + The Arts'
new Miami Beach Urban Studios on Lincoln Road.

Monday, March 5, 2012

The Role of Propaganda Between Italy and Africa, Daniel Alonso

Use of propaganda in Italy and countries taken by the Italians in Africa was essential, so much so that it integrates itself as part of the architecture and the identity of an overtaken city. Inherently, the manipulation and representation of propaganda formats varied for the invader and the invaded. These manipulations distorted perspective in such a way that no matter the angle at which the invasion is viewed, it seems to be the ideal for all parties.
In the Metropole/Colony: Africa and Italy exhibition, the propaganda in the form of art and ephemera in the room, mostly catered to the working Italian public. Clear and deliberate focus on the emotions and prosperity of the Italian people was paramount. The exhibition exemplifies this most notably in the sculpture “La Messe” by an unknown artist. This sculpture depicts a man embracing a bundle of wheat and shares an uncanny resemblance to Michelangelo’s “Pieta”. This sort of imagery is immensely evocative to the masses, and the people responded just as the government needed them to. These emotional responses lead to more concrete signs of one’s patriotism. One manner in which this patriotism and loyalty were displayed was the exchange of one’s gold wedding band for a steel replacement. Now, passersby with the steel band show their loyalty and commitment to creating a better, more prosperous and more independent Italy.
For those that were being invaded, the propaganda took a different form. This was much more a spin on what was the actuality of the situation. The Italians explained the benefits of their arrival; they were to build infrastructure, cities, and buildings. All this was sold to the Africans as an improvement of their current conditions and an introduction to a more refined society. As the architecture was being built there arose implications of a more somber reality. The large public buildings, as was the case in Gondar, were placed on the highest ground while stifling zoning and segregation relegated the original inhabitants to less desirable areas. The buildings followed the fascist model, clear construction, rationalist detailing with quotations of imperial Roman architecture. This sort of construction and segregation imposed new law on the Africans. New boulevards and foreign building types gave the invaded the clear sign that what was theirs was no longer.
Propaganda plays, and always will play, a crucial role in society. Even today some images evoke strong sentiments, typically connected to history. A single image can draw some to think of salvation and freedom, while others think of hatred and persecution, perhaps this is one reason only 35% of Cubans voted for Obama while 64% of Latinos voted for him (76% for young Latino voters). Study the images below and come to your own conclusion.






La Pieta (Left) and La Messe (Right)



A poster of Che Guevara (Left) A poster of Obama (Right)

3 comments:

Priscilla Pagan said...

This is a great point about the how the manipulated propaganda made the Italian invasion seem ideal for all parties, especially with the postcards depicting “accomplishments” like the Fascist’s end of slavery in the colonies. I also agree with the signs of Italians’ patriotism which seems to resonate throughout most of the exhibition.

Diego said...

I agree with the emotional impact that sculptures like "La Messe" have on people. "La Messe" itself is a reaction to the liefestyle, and emotions of the time. And so it is interesting how this reaction actually becomes at some point some sort of "propaganda" for for the fascist lifestyle.

Tom.Pupo said...

The end of your analysis poses an interesting point in perception of symbolism. What we may see in these pieces in the exhibit through correlation of ideals in our time period, may be looked at with biased eyes when compared to people who were seeing this in the social context of their era. Colors, forms, and designs all carry a symbolic weight that can be both positive and negative as you described. Its a matter of seeing the social result to see what implications it carried in the past and it would be interesting to analyze the average current perception to see how the ideals and perspectives have changed.